Well, I hope I won't be the only one replying here. I do understand your frustration at so little feedback. There's probably more than one reason for that. I've been writing for fanzines, newspapers, catalogues and monthly magazines for years now, focusing on European, Asian, obscure and classic cinema. In these trying times of globalization and Americanized culture, it has become increasingly difficult to write about my 'first love' (if you will), which is French cinema. Feedback is usually almost non-existent; if there's people out there who actually read and like what I'm digging up from cinema history, they hardly ever show it. I have (well, almost) resigned to the fact that most readers are not interested in communication, for whatever private reasons. If there's any feedback at all, it's usually negative.
On the other hand: I've struck up long-term friendships just because I wrote something about obscure spaghetti westerns or other stuff that is usually ignored in the press.
Financing a labour of love like a fanzine is a gamble; even contributing to them (I still do, by the way, if time allows) only
costs money. That's okay, after all, it remains a hobby, whether it's gotten out of hand years ago or not. Nobody held a gun to your head and said: 'Publish a fanzine and get ruined!' At 40 (yep, we're from the same year, I guess), however, you tend to get irritated at times at the lack of (further) interest from readers. I know I do, anyway. You wish, perhaps almost demand, that their passion for a particular kind of music, literature or cinema be on the same level as your own. High expectancy levels have a peculiar way of backfiring! The point is not to get disillusioned by that.
Here's a little anecdote for you: years ago I designed a logo for a German metal fanzine called Raging Steel - the guy running it wouldn't even send me a t-shirt with my own goddamn logo on it. Even people you think are going to be cool, sometimes turn out to be a complete waste of space in your life. Again: the point is not to get bitter or disillusioned. I know for sure, though, many outstanding metalbands deserve to be just that.
As far as the 'vitriol' goes: people who have posted messages here telling you to 'shut up and publish the next issue' were probably referring to your own particular way of approaching musicians who (your words, not mine) 'betrayed' metal. That is taking an extreme view of things and causes extreme reactions in turn. You're over 18, you will understand.
All this is to say: keep doing what you like best doing, which is living for metal - and don't forget enjoying it in the process! Your metal heart beats loudly in each and every issue of Snakepit. I would not be writing this if I thought otherwise.
Last but not least: good to see new reviewers in issue 15 - it spices up the 'zine and makes for a welcome diversification. The enthusiastic Hibria-review by Brian Ash made me want to go out and buy the album straight away. That's a compliment for the band, the magazine editor and the review writer.